Sovereign
U.S.-owned, U.S.-controlled infrastructure · Trusted domestic supply chain · Cleared personnel and secure environments · No foreign dependency risk
Contractor handling CUI or export-controlled data? Start with the Enhanced tier →
Operational outcomes, data handling, timeline and acquisition path.
From first conversation through deployment and sustainment.
Designs, builds, owns and operates sovereign AI infrastructure. Founded by former military leaders, special operators, enterprise executives and technologists.
Acquire AI combat capability, not infrastructure.
U.S.-owned, U.S.-controlled infrastructure · Trusted domestic supply chain · Cleared personnel and secure environments · No foreign dependency risk
Zero Trust architecture embedded · Quantum-resilient encryption · SCIF-capable environments · No public internet exposure · Defense-in-depth cyber architecture
Distributed, low-signature nodes · Meshed network topology · Multi-path transport over terrestrial fiber and multi-orbit SATCOM · Resilient off-grid power layers
30–50 MW core AI Arsenal Nodes · Rapidly deployable forward nodes · Mobile, expeditionary AI edge nodes · Modular expansion aligned to operations
Delivered as AI Infrastructure-as-a-Service · No capital expenditure burden · Mission-aligned configuration and scaling
30–50 MW sovereign facilities producing AI combat power at scale, with resilient off-grid power layers.
Rapidly deployable capacity that moves AI closer to operations and expands modularly with the mission.
Mobile, expeditionary AI that keeps working in denied, degraded and contested environments.
What you must proveControlled data, and the model weights trained on it, never leave the boundary. No administrator outside your cleared workforce sits on the training path.
What stands behind itSingle-tenant reserved GPU capacity on dedicated hardware, with zero trust enforced at line rate.
What you must proveData at rest is unreadable to the operator and protected for the life of the program. Custody and deletion are demonstrable.
What stands behind itKeys generated and held inside your environment, post-quantum encryption at every layer, one custody chain across tiers.
What you must proveEvery agent action is authorized, bounded to one handling tier, unable to egress, and attributable to an identity, a dataset and a result.
What stands behind itA sovereign control plane with per-call policy enforcement, no internet egress and full telemetry kept as audit evidence.
High-performance workloads, storage and agent execution for work with no handling restriction.
Open model development · Shared datasets · Agents with external tool access
Full audit logging with export-controlled and CUI segregation across compute, storage and every agent action.
Export-controlled training · Sponsor data archives · Agents bounded to CUI
Dedicated sovereign colocation built to SCI standards for workloads that cannot exist anywhere else.
Classified training · Compartmented archives · Agents with no path outward
Eminence's patent-pending orchestration layer. It builds a network path when a workload starts and tears it down when the work ends, and lets you check isolation and data residency yourself, on demand.
Every action lands in an inspectable operating record. Licensing included.
A dedicated appliance at your site that brokers only approved traffic into the fabric and enforces inspection and access policy at your boundary. It has no presence on the public internet.
Pairs with mobile and edge nodes for forward government use.
Reserved GPU and HPC clusters matched to the job: reasoning, inference, private training or simulation. Bring your own model, or use open-weight models vetted for technical and licensing fit.
NVIDIA DGX B200 and H200 · Grace-based systems · AMD EPYC HPC
Nodes connect over private fiber rather than the internet. In October 2026, Eminence announced a partnership with Lumen Technologies to extend this across the U.S., from edge to core.
Lumen fiber, programmable network and edge footprint
Post-quantum encryption built on Qrypt technology, with defined handling for how keys are generated, distributed, rotated and retired, and evidence you can review.
Protection scope is set and documented per deployment.
Cleared technicians and engineers run the facilities and can work as an extension of your own team, with no foreign-national administrative path.
Founding team: former senior military leaders, special operators and enterprise executives.
Designed to support
These are design targets stated by Eminence, not blanket certifications. Authorization status is confirmed per deployment, and some programs need a government sponsor. MALA requests that documentation as part of every evaluation.
From January 1, 2027, new national security system acquisitions are expected to meet NSA's post-quantum algorithm suite. Data harvested today can be decrypted on an adversary's timeline.
Source: NSA CNSA 2.0 transition timeline What CNSA 2.0 means for AI programs →Physical, cyber, network, encryption and supply chain layers are all attack surfaces. Architecture built for commercial uptime was not built for contested operations.
Municipal data center bans, a Massachusetts incentive pause and multi-year interconnection queues are limiting new AI capacity in New England. Already-permitted, already-powered capacity is scarce.
Source: Eminence Sovereign briefingAgentic AI is arriving faster than the infrastructure to govern it. Agents that can act on controlled data need boundaries they cannot cross.
Source: Booz Allen / Market Connections survey, cited by Eminence Grey| Requirement | Shared GovCloud / GPU cloud | Sovereign AI infrastructure |
|---|---|---|
| Control | Compliance overlay on multi-tenant hardware | Physical and jurisdictional control, single-tenant by construction |
| Performance | Best-effort capacity behind other tenants' training runs | Reserved GPU capacity with predictable throughput |
| Key custody | Provider-held or provider-managed keys | Keys generated and held inside your enclave, post-quantum at every layer |
| Exposure | Internet-reachable control planes and egress paths you cannot see | Air-gapped from the public internet, with no outbound path for workloads or agents |
| Operators | Administrators you do not employ | Cleared, U.S.-person staff with no foreign-national administrative path |
| Portability | Platform-specific services | Open standards and portable workloads |
| Networking | Standing network paths that stay up between jobs | Paths created per workload at runtime and removed afterward |
| Commercials | Metered usage across many line items | One agreement at a flat monthly rate over a defined term |
MALA stays involved at every stage, not just until the contract is signed.
Mission outcomes, data handling and acquisition path.
Workloads, storage and agents to the right handling tier.
Sovereign, cloud and hybrid options on fit and cost.
Walk the facility with your infrastructure and security leads.
One real workload with the audit artifacts you need.
Topology, compute, access and controls, closed out with acceptance evidence.
Performance reviews, expansion and renewals.
Department of War mission owners standing up AI-first capability.
Training and running models on export-controlled and CUI data. Aerospace & defense advisory →
National labs, research programs and civilian agencies that need compute they cannot self-build in time.
Firms needing a compliant enclave for AI work under DFARS and CMMC. Government contractor advisory →
A MALA-led briefing, then a walk through the facility with your infrastructure and security leads.
What must be proven in each domain, which controls belong to whom, and where your gaps sit.
One real workload in a sovereign tier, with the audit artifacts your security organization needs to certify it.
Common starting points
An advisor responds within one business day.
Full terms: MALA Privacy Policy ·